del
01-24-2014, 05:20 PM
I thought i'd share some new information I received about a few artifacts I recovered for a museum.
A couple of years ago while doing work for the Mashantucket Pequot Indian Museum i recovered a cache of old iron tools along an area of woods . the whole an ongoing story can be read here .
http://www.americandetectorist.com/forum/showthread.php?9955-The-Pequot-War-Saga-%28finding-history%29
This stretch of woods was very near a historic battle that happened in May 26th 1637 and along a retreat route where English soldiers and Indian allies fled for their lives from a much larger Pequot war party. The tools were recovered at about 15 inches and consisted of an adze
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironadzhead1.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironadzhead1.jpg.html)
a hammer like tool
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironhammerhead21.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironhammerhead21.jpg.html)
and what to me and Anthropologist Dr. McBride looked like a "trade ax"
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/irontradeaxupsidedownsideview1.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/irontradeaxupsidedownsideview1.jpg.html)
There was much talk and confusion about these items since there was much later activity at these woods. During the 18th and 19th centuries parts of these same woods were farmed , logged for trees and even quarried for stone . It was much speculated that these tools were 1800's era shipbuilding tools apparently thrown out as there were areas of dumping or they were simply lost. I can tell you George (Coinnut) and I had a lot of doubt about this for a few reasons .
That was about two years ago but last week George and I get the same e-mail from Dr. McBride with some news about the iron artifacts . The conservator labs have finally gotten around to cleaning and preserving the tools to reveal two sets of "touch marks" on the the axe.
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1005111_zps66284091.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1005111_zps66284091.jpg.html)
A touch mark is like a makers mark the blacksmith , tool maker or company they work for put on the tool when the item was made. The axe has three sets of marks on both sides which may indicate weight ( 3lbs) of the particular axe head ( a common practice back then) .
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1016111_zps14c46a12.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1016111_zps14c46a12.jpg.html)
while they haven't deciphered the mark ( OI ) they are pretty confident its from the correct time period and could of very well been lost during that day of the battle. The other tools like the adze , others have been found almost exactly like it in "period" native Indian burial graves .The hammer may be a brick hammer and an extremely close example to one that was found at Jamestown Virginia .
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/axehammerandadz1_zpsc70b3321.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/axehammerandadz1_zpsc70b3321.jpg.html)
The fun for them (archaeologists) is to now piece together as to how exactly the tools got on the retreat route , were they hastely dropped to lighten the load , were they purposely hidden to be retrieved when the individual returned ?? was it some of the "spoils of war" ??
I just love the history and to be a part in finding it for future generations to learn from it is a great feeling. thanks for letting me share this .
Dan
A couple of years ago while doing work for the Mashantucket Pequot Indian Museum i recovered a cache of old iron tools along an area of woods . the whole an ongoing story can be read here .
http://www.americandetectorist.com/forum/showthread.php?9955-The-Pequot-War-Saga-%28finding-history%29
This stretch of woods was very near a historic battle that happened in May 26th 1637 and along a retreat route where English soldiers and Indian allies fled for their lives from a much larger Pequot war party. The tools were recovered at about 15 inches and consisted of an adze
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironadzhead1.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironadzhead1.jpg.html)
a hammer like tool
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironhammerhead21.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/ironhammerhead21.jpg.html)
and what to me and Anthropologist Dr. McBride looked like a "trade ax"
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/irontradeaxupsidedownsideview1.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/irontradeaxupsidedownsideview1.jpg.html)
There was much talk and confusion about these items since there was much later activity at these woods. During the 18th and 19th centuries parts of these same woods were farmed , logged for trees and even quarried for stone . It was much speculated that these tools were 1800's era shipbuilding tools apparently thrown out as there were areas of dumping or they were simply lost. I can tell you George (Coinnut) and I had a lot of doubt about this for a few reasons .
That was about two years ago but last week George and I get the same e-mail from Dr. McBride with some news about the iron artifacts . The conservator labs have finally gotten around to cleaning and preserving the tools to reveal two sets of "touch marks" on the the axe.
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1005111_zps66284091.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1005111_zps66284091.jpg.html)
A touch mark is like a makers mark the blacksmith , tool maker or company they work for put on the tool when the item was made. The axe has three sets of marks on both sides which may indicate weight ( 3lbs) of the particular axe head ( a common practice back then) .
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1016111_zps14c46a12.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/Pequot%20Indian%20Museum%20hunt%20pictures/axe1016111_zps14c46a12.jpg.html)
while they haven't deciphered the mark ( OI ) they are pretty confident its from the correct time period and could of very well been lost during that day of the battle. The other tools like the adze , others have been found almost exactly like it in "period" native Indian burial graves .The hammer may be a brick hammer and an extremely close example to one that was found at Jamestown Virginia .
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr228/del1786/axehammerandadz1_zpsc70b3321.jpg (http://s486.photobucket.com/user/del1786/media/axehammerandadz1_zpsc70b3321.jpg.html)
The fun for them (archaeologists) is to now piece together as to how exactly the tools got on the retreat route , were they hastely dropped to lighten the load , were they purposely hidden to be retrieved when the individual returned ?? was it some of the "spoils of war" ??
I just love the history and to be a part in finding it for future generations to learn from it is a great feeling. thanks for letting me share this .
Dan